Monday, May 27, 2013
First off, I know that Finland is getting lots of recognition for excellence in education, New Zealand not so much. Finland has no beaches, though. More, admin travel is a bit questionable when schools are cutting teaching staff. After all, these are times of conference calls and TED talks, neither of which include hotel rooms nor airplane ticket. And, although there is no room service in the CBE office elephant, there must surely be one flunkey in that over-bloated bureaucracy who could be sent to fetch a coffee and a donut.
The worst outcome would be if the Chief actually came back with an idea that she wanted to implement. The cost of that would be disastrous for classrooms across the city. A couple of administrations ago, the then Chief wanted the CBE to be known as a leader in education in the English speaking world, so she invented "Quality Learning" and hosted a convention-like event to promote it. The first one seemed a success. There were the usual array of ed celebs. Rex Murphy spoke at his wordy best. There was much patting of sycophantic backs at the debrief dinner. And there was smattering of applause for the student journalists and their teachers who wrote the daily newsletters that became the only evidence that something had happened. It was a quality learning experience for those young writers, for sure.
The second Quality Learning Conference was a financial disaster. There were fine speakers, a classy venue, and lots of glossy promotion. Few registered. To fill the seats, teachers were offered several incentives. Few registered. Money was found to subsidize registrations, and in the final tally, although the attendance as less than stellar, it was face saving. But the cost . . . A new group of student journalists did an amazing job of reporting on the variety of speakers on a daily basis. Thus, there was some actual quality learning that took place. The loss of money was appalling, and pretty soon, the CBE had a new Chief Supe.
He went to a conference in Seattle and there heard about Pathways to Success, or some such edubabble phrase, and determined that Calgary Public ought to take that trail. He presented the idea and told the bureaucracy and school administrators to do it. Just figure it out and do it. And they did, and it cost another pot full of money. It also alienated much of the teaching staff (who were really very interested in teaching their classes) and almost every student. The young people resented the time taken away from their learning. Wow! Now maybe there was something in that quality learning notion after all. (sarcasm, in case you missed it, or I missed it) After many attempts at restructuring and even re-naming, Pathways turned right into oblivion, and CBE got a new Chief.
Now, I am no longer in the ed biz, so I won't feel the pain should Chief Johnson get buzzed by some sheep shearing notion from Middle Earth. However, I think Calgary students would be better served if the Board kept her at home and monitored her emails for silly and expensive education innovations.
Saturday, May 25, 2013
Bibbing with Beppi
In any event, I note that the Globe shows an increased concern with Toronna's claim to world-classism. The Globe Style section includes, along with many suggestions as to how readers can dispose of their income, a Wine & Spirits column by Beppi Crosariol. Well, I am dazzled.
After many words in a language I can scarcely understand, Beppi tells me that Beaujolais goes well with burgers - or at least he "sides with" Rajat Parr, the wine director of San Francisco's RN74 (wowee) in that choice. I don't know whether Beppi is just worried about making a clumsy recommendation or if he is name dropping.
In rural Saskatchewan in the 1960s, I learned about wine - what we called "porch-climber." So, my tastes are simple: give me a Calona Red Dry in a gallon jug that I can drink over the crook of my arm. That goes well with anything.
So, when Beppi describes one of his choices for the week (I guess), I am quite surprised. "this cabernet -led red Bordeaux shows a supple texture and great purity of fruit, leaning toward black currant and cherry, along with chocolate, lively spice and a funky barnyard note."
Most of that makes no sense whatsoever to me. My wine was made from grapes, not other fruit. If we were offered dandelion wine, we knew what it was going in. There was no sneaking other weeds into the jug. As for chocolate and spices . . . well, drinking chocolate was mixed with milk in good old Vico, and spice was what my mom never used in her cooking. "Supple" reminds me of the girls of my youth.
But that funky barnyard note? Well Beppi, old son, you could maybe convince me about that other stuff in the bottle, but there is no way I am going to drink shit.
I wonder about Harper. He surely serves it.
Thursday, May 23, 2013
Grand boy
Last night, Mom and Dad went to the new Star Trek movie, and Xavier stayed home to take care of Poppa. After an hour of watching bits of The Phantom Menace that was frequently interrupted by fingerprints and scratches, he brought the banana tree from the kitchen and gave it to Poppa. Then he climbed up, snuggled in, ate his bedtime banana, and shared the peel. Outside, Bruin barked, so Poppa said, "Let Bruin in, please." When they came back, Xavi climbed up, laid his head on Poppa's shoulder and went right to sleep.
Everyone thinks he is a beautiful child, and that may be so. For me, it's when he takes my hand as we walk the dog, or when he climbs up to snuggle, that his beauty is most clear.
Shirl loved him, it seemed, from the moment of his conception. She was an amazing grandma, "Grandmom," he called her. She was forever putting him in my arms or setting him on my lap, making me feed him and change his diaper. Knowing my nature as an observer, she dragged me out of my sitting back and into pitching in. She reminded me once again (necessary redundancy as I am a slow learner) that love is totally hands-on living. When I am missing her the most, his "I love you Poppa" is the only salve for my broken heart.
Wednesday, May 15, 2013
Is enough enough?
Sunday, October 3, 2010
37th Street overpass
First, the overpass itself is some distance to the east of 37th. It is bracketed on either end by a traffic circle. The bridge forms the middle of a curve. If this makes no sense to anyone, it is not the fault of my communication skills but rather the fault of the designers for having built such an abomination.
Why not make a normal overpass and cloverleaf interchange, I wondered. Well, I suppose that it is because the Tsu t'ina would not let the City build on any sacred land. I noted in passing (very slowly) that the southernmost traffic circle has an exit for Grey Eagle Casino, so we Calgarians did not respond in kind, at least.
The upshot, however, is the worst interchange in a city of botched traffic control crossings. I guess it is consistent, however. There still is no interchange that resembles any other. It makes for excitement, if not for efficiency. Also, it will surely prevent drivers from speeding, but it may cause some extra demand for already overworked autobody shops. Single lane traffic circles are fine as calming devices on residential roads, but smooth flow requires two lanes.
My neighbor's son is a traffic engineer in Calgary, and he seems like a sensible enough man. I am sure he did not attend Cracker Jack University, but it certainly appears that the majority of Calgary's traffic designers got their diplomas out of a popcorn box.
Friday, October 1, 2010
Doctor, doctor
When I was a little boy, my cousin Donna and I used to play doctor. It was a popular game amongst children then, and I expect that it still is. However, when adults play doctor, it is a different and very serious game.
Yesterday, the Herald had an item about what the Alberta government is planning to do to get a sufficient number of doctors to care for the citizens’ health. (Has anyone noted that we are not really citizens anymore; we are taxpayers, clients, and electors. Nobody wants our participation, just our goods.) Also, Alberta Health is extending from two weeks to three months the probation period for doctors from South Africa before they can be fully licensed. In the afternoon’s mail, there was a solicitation from Medecins sans frontieres.
Well, juxtaposition is a big deal in an English teacher’s life, so I took notice.
I have long known that Alberta Health has built and then mothballed medical facilities because Alberta doesn’t have enough staff to operate the operating rooms, as it were. And here was the Minister himself proclaiming that heretofore unacknowledged situation. Well, bravo! But what is with the SA docs? Well, here in “our Alberta,” we are not training enough women and men to serve our needs. It appears that it is too costly. So we recruit doctors from Africa. Hmm. Now here comes MSF wanting support in their noble and self-sacrificing work in Africa where there are not enough doctors to serve people’s needs. Sounds familiar.
But why has Africa such a shortage? Do they not train doctors? Well, they must do so, and do it well, because lots of them are recruited to work in Alberta where we have mothballed facilities due to our unwillingness to pay for the medical training of young Albertans. Oops!
So, to deconstruct, we import people trained in impoverished third world countries to tend our ills, leaving the people who trained them to rely on the charity of MSF for their care.
And the moral of the story is . . . we very carefully pat ourselves on the back for being so multicultural and so non-racist. Moral of the story, maybe, but ethical?
So the way we play doctor now, somebody ends up getting screwed. Children’s curious investigations were more medically ethical, I think—first of all, do no harm.
Tuesday, December 30, 2008
Whose day is it anyhow?
And here is thing: I feel good sharing my good feeling with people that I meet in shops or at the CO -OP, or at work--just wherever I am. And I hope that people will know that I am expressing a sincere best wish to them in words that are most meaningful to me. At least that is how I used to feel. Now, I am hesitant. I haven't changed: I still want to share what I have in my heart, but now the word is out that I am being offensive to some people of different beliefs. Now, I really do care about the integrity of belief, and I have the greatest respect for how everyone deals with their spirituality. So, I hesitate to offer greetings and end up mumbling, "Happy holidays." And then I feel as if I have let everyone down by being insincere.
To solve my problem, and that of anyone offended by cheery Christmas greetings, I have a proposal. Lets' abolish extended vacation time associated with religious celebrations. No more Christmas holidays, no more Easter holidays. Instead, let's take mid-term breaks in the fall and in the spring semesters. we can still focus the break on the grade school year. The rationalization of the dates would benefit the education system providing opporunity for balanced semesters and exams at the end of the instruction period (with no intervening Christmas holiday, for example). But the big pay-off is in terms of equal recognition of all religions.
In this system, everyone gets an entitlement to four days of religious celebration time. So, the Christians can choose time at Christmas and at Easter; the Muslims can choose Eid and Ramadan; the Jews can choose Passover and Hanukah, for example. Or they can anme whichever religious festival they prefer. The atheists can go to work and feel righteous! God won't mind their use of a religious term. The point is, every world religion has days that are important in the calendar of their worship year. Observants should be accorded the dignity of their faith by our society. For all I know, there may be a "There is no God Day" and a "I believe nothing day" so that such folk could gather and curse rather than pray.
The point surely is, if Christians deserve time away from work to worship, so to do beilevers of every faith. And, just think of the benefits to Christians of not having everyone else taking time off for our festival days. We won't be complaining about hypocrites nearly as much; we won't whine about commercialization or about nobody recognizing the "real message" of Christmas. all of us who are celebrating Christ's birth are doing so because we really get that message. And anyone who wants to come and share our joy will be welcomed with open hearts. And wouldn't that feel good?
Then, if we really get into the spirit of equality that is at the heart of most religions, we might just decide that nobody will get a recognized religious festival time off. Because we are faithful, we will live it every day and special celebrations will be part of our routine day. After work, we will go home or to church and celebrate, just like people of faiths other than Christian do now.
Then, what we believe will be revealed through our actions and not just a repetition of something that our society does every year at those times in order to boost retail sales.
